Dspace @ IIM Kozhikode

4. An Empirical Analysis of Sustainability Disclosure Practices: Evidence from India and China

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Aparna Bhatia
dc.contributor.author Siya Tuli
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-23T07:22:27Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-23T07:22:27Z
dc.date.issued 2014-07
dc.identifier.issn 2277-9752
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2259/905
dc.description IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review 3(2) 135–148 © 2014 Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode en_US
dc.description.abstract The present study seeks to access and compare the sustainability reporting practices in two major economies, that is, India and China. Index developed under global reporting initiative (GRI) guidelines is used. Content analysis is employed as a data collection tool. A total of 17 companies from BSE-30 (India) and 19 companies from SSE 50 (China), producing sustainability reports within the time period 2006–2007 to 2010–2011, comprise the sample set. Independent sample t test is used to compare the disclosure practices of India and China. Also, Kruskal–Wallis H test is applied for intercategory and inter-industry comparison of both countries. The results reveal that the sustainability disclosure scores are higher with respect to Indian companies as compared to Chinese companies. The results of independent sample t test are also significant at 1 per cent level of significance. However, Kruskal–Wallis H test suggests insignificant differences in the category-wise and industry-wise disclosure scores of both countries, that is, India and China. It is strongly recommended that China should strive more for sustainability practices in order to keep pace with its counterpart, that is, India. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sage Publications en_US
dc.subject Sustainability reporting en_US
dc.subject Global reporting initiative (GRI) en_US
dc.subject BSE-30 en_US
dc.subject SSE 50 en_US
dc.subject Content analysis en_US
dc.title 4. An Empirical Analysis of Sustainability Disclosure Practices: Evidence from India and China en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • July [8]
    2014: Vol 3 (2): 109-201

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account